Specific Relief Act, 1877
Summary
The Specific Relief Act, 1877 is a civil law that tells courts what remedies they can order when someone's legal rights have been violated, beyond just awarding money damages. It sets out when a court can force a wrongdoer to actually do (or undo) something, rather than simply pay compensation.
Section 8 lets a person recover specific immovable property (land or buildings) they are entitled to possess, and Section 9 gives a fast-track remedy to someone who was wrongfully dispossessed of immovable property, letting them sue for recovery of possession purely on the basis of dispossession. Sections 10 and 11 do the same for movable property, allowing a court to order that a specific item be handed back rather than just paying its value.
A large part of the Act (Sections 12 to 30) deals with specific performance of contracts -- ordering a party to actually carry out what they promised in a contract, instead of just paying damages for breach. It lists which contracts can and cannot be specifically enforced, who can seek this remedy and against whom, and how a court exercises its discretion (Section 22) when deciding whether to grant it.
Other chapters deal with correcting written agreements: Sections 31-34 let a court rectify (correct) a written instrument that does not reflect what the parties actually agreed; Sections 35-38 cover rescission (cancelling a contract); and Sections 39-41 cover cancellation of documents that are void or voidable, such as forged or fraudulently obtained deeds. Sections 42-43 allow a court to make a declaratory decree confirming a person's legal status or right even without ordering any other relief, and Section 44 allows courts to appoint receivers to manage disputed property.
Part III (Sections 52-57) deals with injunctions -- court orders stopping someone from doing something. It distinguishes temporary injunctions (which last only during a case) from perpetual injunctions (permanent orders made at the end of a trial), and sets out when a mandatory injunction (ordering positive action) is appropriate and when an injunction will be refused, for example to enforce a contract for personal services.
This is a very old law dating to 1877, and the extract contains numerous amendment footnotes ("Subs. by", references to the Central Laws (Statute Reform) Ordinance 1960 and various Adaptation Orders). Given its age and repeated amendment, anyone relying on a specific section for practical purposes should verify the current, up-to-date text rather than relying solely on this summary.